0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¤½Å°£È£»çÀÇ °Ý¸®¡¤°­¹Ú Àû¿ë¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤ ¿äÀΠŽ»ö: Æ÷Ä¿½º ±×·ì ÀÎÅͺä Àû¿ë

Exploring Decision-Making Factors of Psychiatric Nurses in the Application of Seclusion and Restraint: Applying Focus Group Interviews

Á¤½Å°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2018³â 27±Ç 4È£ p.380 ~ 393
KMID : 0607320180270040380
¹Ú°æȯ ( Park Kyung-Hwan ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ

Àå¹ÌÈñ ( Jang Mi-Heui ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore psychiatric nurses¡¯ decision making in the use of seclusion and restraint (SR).

Methods: Data were collected using focus group interviews. Two focus group interviews were held with a total of 10 psychiatric nurse participants. All interviews were recorded and transcribed, and data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: Eleven categories emerged from three main themes. All the themes describe factors that participants took into account when deciding whether to implement SR: 1) Personal factors area: ¡®Personal attributes of nurses,¡¯ ¡®Attitude of nurses regarding SR,¡¯ ¡®Nurses¡¯ physical and emotional states,¡¯ ¡®Negative experiences of nurses related to SR¡¯; 2) Relational factors area: ¡®The level of cooperation between nurses and doctors,¡¯ ¡®Role models created by seniors and colleagues,¡¯ ¡®The level of support by nursing assistants,¡¯ ¡®Therapeutic relations with patients¡¯; and 3) Environmental factors area: ¡®Poor nursing work environment,¡¯ ¡®Atmosphere of ward regarding SR,¡¯ and ¡®Social atmosphere to raise alarm about SR.¡¯

Conclusion: These findings should be considered in the evaluation of the use of SR in psychiatric hospital settings and appropriate strategies used to help minimize the use of restraint.
KeyWords
½ÅüÀû °­¹Ú, ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤, Á¤½Å°£È£, Æ÷Ä¿½º ±×·ì, ÁúÀû ¿¬±¸
Restraint, Physical, Decision making, Psychiatric nursing, Focus groups, Qualitative research
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed